<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Singapore Airlines A380 rules: Auckland &#8211; Singapore &#8211; London</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/2009/06/21/singapore-airlines-a380-rules-auckland-singapore-london/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/2009/06/21/singapore-airlines-a380-rules-auckland-singapore-london/</link>
	<description>Moving from London in 2005, this describes life in New Plymouth, Wellington, back in London, and then back to NZ again. Ping Pong.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:54:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/2009/06/21/singapore-airlines-a380-rules-auckland-singapore-london/comment-page-1/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/?p=575#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>Hey, Singapore Airlines are definitely the best option out there. I have flown many of the airlines available to Asia&amp; Europe. The flight that leaves Auckland at around 1am is on Singapores&#039; older 777-200ER which are being phased out, but if you fly on their much newer 777-300ER, which has the exact same interior to the A380 which leaves Auckland at around 1pm, arriving into Singapore at 7pm is a much better option, and still connects well with an A380 flight to London. I personally would never fly Air NZ long haul again, and try to avoid them on shorter flights as well. This is because of firstly their declining service and centering in Economy, and secondly ont heir newest aircraft (777-300ER) they have squeezed in an extra seat in every  row to make 10 seats per row compared to most other legacy carriers such as Singapore Airlines who have 9 across</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Singapore Airlines are definitely the best option out there. I have flown many of the airlines available to Asia&#038; Europe. The flight that leaves Auckland at around 1am is on Singapores&#8217; older 777-200ER which are being phased out, but if you fly on their much newer 777-300ER, which has the exact same interior to the A380 which leaves Auckland at around 1pm, arriving into Singapore at 7pm is a much better option, and still connects well with an A380 flight to London. I personally would never fly Air NZ long haul again, and try to avoid them on shorter flights as well. This is because of firstly their declining service and centering in Economy, and secondly ont heir newest aircraft (777-300ER) they have squeezed in an extra seat in every  row to make 10 seats per row compared to most other legacy carriers such as Singapore Airlines who have 9 across</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

