<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd">

<channel>
	<title>NZ Bound &#187; china</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/tag/china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nzbound.metime.org.uk</link>
	<description>Moving from London in 2005, this describes life in New Plymouth, Wellington, back in London, and some cool places in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>China to buy stake in Morgan Stanley?</title>
		<link>http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/2008/09/20/china-to-buy-stake-in-morgan-stanley/</link>
		<comments>http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/2008/09/20/china-to-buy-stake-in-morgan-stanley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarb Johal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General NZ Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morgan stanley]]></category>
<category>china</category><category>credit crunch</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[blingojingo <p>Following up from my post yesterday, this has been talked about since the end of last year &#8211; a sale of about a $5 billion stake in Morgan Stanley to a Chinese government sovereign fund. Indeed, China Investment Corporation bought a 9.9% share at the end of last year after Morgan Stanley posted a huge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[blingojingo <p>Following up from my post yesterday, this has been talked about <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/19/business/19cnd-morgan.html" target="_blank">since the end of last year</a> &#8211; a sale of about a $5 billion stake in Morgan Stanley to a Chinese government sovereign fund. Indeed, China Investment Corporation bought a 9.9% share at the end of last year after Morgan Stanley posted a huge quarterly loss. But this has developed further into a possibility of <a href="http://http://business.theage.com.au/business/morgan-stanley-may-sell-stake-to-chinese-sovereign-fund-20080919-4kb1.html" target="_blank">a 49% share purchase</a> of the institution. </p>
<p>The recent fall of the US dollar meant that the cash-rich Chinese government hoard of currency has taken a bit of a pounding. The recent increase in value would have been somewhat pleasing for those holding US dollars, but I&#8217;m pretty doubtful that will continue. Indeed, China might find itself in the position that it&#8217;s key markets may have imploded if the USA and Europe are headed for deep and entrenched economies. </p>
<p>The recent bounce in share prices over the past couple of days does not signal increased confidence in the markets in my opinion. I think it is more a function of the ban on short-selling. This is the practice of borrowing shares to sell them, in the hope of buying them at a cheaper price later. As the positions were unwound, this would lead to an increase in price. Two things happened at once in the last couple of days &#8211; injection of liquidity into the markets by the central banks and the temporary ban of short-selling. I think they are confounded and that most people are attributing the stock market bounce to the increased liquidity in the system. My hunch is that this is a false attribution. </p>
<p>A lot of analysts <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/sep/19/banking.creditcrunch1" target="_blank">reckon this isn&#8217;t over by a long shot</a>. I&#8217;d have to agree.</p>
<div class="acc_license"><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" alt="by-nc-nd" /></a></div><!--<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><Work rdf:about=""><license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/" /></Work><License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><requires rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Attribution" /><permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" /><permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" /><prohibits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#CommercialUse" /><requires rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Notice" /></License></rdf:RDF>-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/2008/09/20/china-to-buy-stake-in-morgan-stanley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could China soon own the entire USA and UK financial system?</title>
		<link>http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/2008/09/19/could-china-soon-own-the-entire-usa-and-uk-financial-system/</link>
		<comments>http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/2008/09/19/could-china-soon-own-the-entire-usa-and-uk-financial-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 01:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarb Johal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General NZ Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Peston]]></category>
<category>china</category><category>credit crunch</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[blingojingo <p>Robert Peston has an interesting piece on the new arrangements hastily being put in place to stave off the collapse in confidence in some very basic financial institutions central to the stability of the USA and UK, and arguable more global systems. The fact that the Bank of England had to overnight loan 40 billion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[blingojingo <p>Robert Peston has <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/" target="_blank">an interesting piece</a> on the new arrangements hastily being put in place to stave off the collapse in confidence in some very basic financial institutions central to the stability of the USA and UK, and arguable more global systems. The fact that the Bank of England had to overnight loan 40 billion pounds to the Federal Reserve of the USA indicates just how little liquidity is out there, or how big these debt liabilities are. Perhaps a little of both.</p>
<p>Peston goes on to speculate that the Chinese state , if it marshaled all the resources available to it through sovereign funds, and cash-rich institutions , could end up snapping up some of the major names in investment and retail banking, and with it a stake in the heartlands of both the UK and the USA &#8211; perhaps even wider afield.</p>
<p>My sense is that is not an unrealistic possibility. It may be hidden from our direct gaze, but I could see this happening. And quickly too. Sobering times.</p>
<div class="acc_license"><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" alt="by-nc-nd" /></a></div><!--<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><Work rdf:about=""><license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/" /></Work><License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><requires rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Attribution" /><permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" /><permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" /><prohibits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#CommercialUse" /><requires rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Notice" /></License></rdf:RDF>-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nzbound.metime.org.uk/2008/09/19/could-china-soon-own-the-entire-usa-and-uk-financial-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
